Experts

Jennifer Lawless

Fast Facts

  • Chair, UVA Department of Politics
  • Author or co-author of six books
  • Editor of the American Journal of Political Science
  • Expertise on women and politics, campaigns and elections, political media

Areas Of Expertise

  • Domestic Affairs
  • Media and the Press
  • Governance
  • Elections
  • Politics

Jennifer L. Lawless is the Leone Reaves and George W. Spicer Professor of Politics at the University of Virginia and chair of the UVA Department of Politics. She is also has affiliations with UVA’s Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy and the Miller Center.

Her research focuses on political ambition, campaigns and elections, and media and politics. Her most recent book, News Hole: The Demise of Local Journalism and Political Engagement, won the Harvard Shorenstein Center 2023 Goldsmith Prize for Best Academic Book. Lawless is also the author or co-author of seven other books, including Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era (with Danny Hayes) and It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office (with Richard L. Fox). Her research, which has been supported by the National Science Foundation, has appeared in numerous academic journals and is regularly cited in the popular press.

Lawless is the co-editor in chief of the American Journal of Political Science. She graduated from Union College with a BA in political science and Stanford University with an MA and PhD in political science. In 2006, she sought the Democratic nomination for the U.S. House of Representatives in Rhode Island’s second congressional district. Although she lost the race, she remains an obsessive political junkie.

Jennifer Lawless News Feed

The latest presidential debate provided voters with information about the candidates’ positions on impeachment, the opioid crisis, Syria, tech company monopolies, health care and reproductive rights. It offered viewers an opportunity to assess the candidates’ age, health, demeanor and strategies for defeating Donald Trump. And it allowed the candidates the time—albeit in 30-second increments—to lay out their visions for the future. Given the wide-ranging substantive and stylistic ground the candidates covered, we might be tempted to look for ways that the debate moved the needle. But that’s a fool’s errand. With 12 people on the stage and the two front-runners avoiding major pitfalls, it’s almost impossible—mathematically—for anyone else to gain momentum.
Jennifer Lawless POLITICO Magazine
Sanders, who draws on backing from progressive voters reaching back to his unsuccessful 2016 primary bid against Hillary Clinton, may not see any immediate drop in support, said Jennifer Lawless, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia. The stronger risk is that it will be more difficult for him to gather new supporters, she said.
Jennifer Lawless Bloomberg
The minute election results are in, federal candidates begin seeking reelection. But imagine an election reform bill that limits the length of federal campaigns and all campaign-related activities to 90 days or, what the heck, even six months. American politics would have no choice but to become a little less broken.
Jennifer Lawless POLITICO Magazine
Professor Jennifer Lawless of the University of Virginia political science department says there is a method to Cicilline’s strategy, “Cicilline can be a watchdog for the voter and a partisan attack dog at the same time. He represents a heavily Democratic district, so he’s well-positioned to hold Republicans accountable for bad behavior without having to worry about suffering at the polls," said Lawless.
Jennifer Lawless GoLocal Prov
What changed after Thursday night’s debate? Pretty much nothing. The front-runners remain the front-runners, despite rather lackluster performances. In order for Biden to blow his lead, he needed to do something far more appalling than ramble from time to time or refer to a “record player.” He didn’t.
Jennifer Lawless POLITICO Magazine
But would a woman really be less electable? It’s important to remember that this assumption could become a self-fulfilling prophecy, says Jennifer Lawless, an expert on gender and politics and a professor at the University of Virginia. True, some voters may judge a candidate based on her gender, but presidential elections and voters’ reactions to candidates are actually far more nuanced than that.
Jennifer Lawless The Christian Science Monitor