Jennifer Lawless

Faculty Senior Fellow

Fast Facts

Chair, UVA Department of Politics
Author or co-author of six books
Editor of the American Journal of Political Science
Expertise on women and politics, campaigns and elections, political media

Areas Of Expertise

Domestic Affairs
Media and the Press
Governance
Elections
Politics

Jennifer L. Lawless is the Leone Reaves and George W. Spicer Professor of Politics at the University of Virginia and chair of the UVA Department of Politics. She is also has affiliations with UVA’s Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy and the Miller Center.

Her research focuses on political ambition, campaigns and elections, and media and politics. Her most recent book, News Hole: The Demise of Local Journalism and Political Engagement, won the Harvard Shorenstein Center 2023 Goldsmith Prize for Best Academic Book. Lawless is also the author or co-author of seven other books, including Women on the Run: Gender, Media, and Political Campaigns in a Polarized Era (with Danny Hayes) and It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office (with Richard L. Fox). Her research, which has been supported by the National Science Foundation, has appeared in numerous academic journals and is regularly cited in the popular press.

Lawless is the co-editor in chief of the American Journal of Political Science. She graduated from Union College with a BA in political science and Stanford University with an MA and PhD in political science. In 2006, she sought the Democratic nomination for the U.S. House of Representatives in Rhode Island’s second congressional district. Although she lost the race, she remains an obsessive political junkie.

Jennifer Lawless News Feed

Record number of candidates running for Congress in Houston area

The back-to-back records are part of a national spike in political activism that has translated into more candidates running for office in the era of President Donald Trump, said Jennifer Lawless, a politics professor at the University of Virginia. “Trump’s election provided the political catalyst for Democrats in 2018,” Lawless said. “Now there is a response from Republicans, which is an indirect effect of Trump.”

Jennifer Lawless Houston Chronicle

‘The Democratic Field Ended Up Impeaching Itself’

With only six candidates on the stage, voters finally had an opportunity to hear each contender speak about many issues—Iran, North Korea, health care, child care, education, climate change, to name just a handful. They also saw candidates spar over whether millionaires’ kids should have to pay for public college, U.S. troops should remain in the Middle East or a female candidate could defeat Donald Trump. Given the wide-ranging ground the candidates covered and the fact that there’s no clear frontrunner in Iowa, we might be tempted to conclude that Tuesday night’s debate really mattered. But it probably didn’t, for three basic reasons.

Jennifer Lawless POLITICO Magazine

The Problem With Worrying That A Woman Can’t Defeat Trump

Jennifer Lawless is a political science professor at the University of Virginia who co-authored a 2016 book that examined female candidates and the biases they face. Lawless found that the perception of sexism in the electoral arena at the congressional level was widespread. “You had more than 50% of voters believe that a woman couldn’t win an election, couldn’t raise as much money, faced higher standards on the campaign trail. And as a result, female candidates think that they need to be more qualified than the men against whom they compete,” Lawless said.

Jennifer Lawless HuffPost

Boys’ Club: In RI, Only 3 of the Top 22 Democratic Positions Are Held By Women

“Given Rhode Island’s political culture, there’s a tendency to conclude that the male-dominated government is a result of gender discrimination on the part of voters, donors, and even the media,” said Jennifer Lawless, Professor of Political Science at the University of Virginia. “The good news is, none of that’s true. Sure, there are sexist voters, sexist donors, and sexist reporters. But systematically, when women run for office, they raise just as much money and garner just as many votes as men.”

Jennifer Lawless GoLocal Prov

‘They Don’t Believe Buttigieg Will Be the Nominee’

Biden and Buttigieg had the most to lose in Wednesday night’s debate, albeit for different reasons. In Biden’s case, his failure to clear the field revealed vulnerabilities that paved the way for Michael Bloomberg and Deval Patrick to throw their hats into the ring. If Biden couldn’t deliver a strong debate performance, then voters might get behind one of the new alternatives. For Buttigieg, his rise in the polls placed a target on his back. The high stakes suited both men well. Their performances were far from flawless. Biden began the night with some pretty significant verbal stumbles, and Buttigieg took far too long to assuage voters’ concerns about his political inexperience and credentials. But they still emerged as the debate’s clear winners, hands down, for two reasons.

Jennifer Lawless POLITICO Magazine

Impeachment’s rock stars: Powerful women

“The women being called in are not administrative assistants who might have heard something” but accomplished experts, says Jennifer Lawless, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia who’s written extensively about women in office. “That matters, that level of growth.”

Jennifer Lawless The Christian Science Monitor

Experts

Experts

Fast Facts

Areas Of Expertise

Featured Publications

Jennifer Lawless (co-author)

Jennifer Lawless

Jennifer Lawless

Jennifer Lawless

Jennifer Lawless

Jennifer Lawless

Jennifer Lawless

Jennifer Lawless News Feed